TRAC2 Criteria
| Who's working on it? | Approved
| Proofread
| Comments
|
---|
3.1 Governance & Organizational Viability
| Aurianne, Karl, Other | | | |
3.1.1 Mission statement
|
| 
| 
| |
3.1.2 Preservation strategic plan
| | 
| 
| |
3.1.2.1 Succession, contigency, escrow plans
| | 
| 
| |
3.1.2.2 Monitor environment for time to deploy succession,contingency, escrow
| | 
| 
| |
3.1.3 Collection policy
| | 
| 
| |
3.2 Organizational Structure & Staffing
| | | | |
3.2.1 Identified duties and appointed staff
| | 
| | |
3.2.1.1 Identified and established duties
| | 
| | |
3.2.1.2 Appropriate number of staff
| | 
| | |
3.2.1.3 Professional development program
| | 
| | |
3.3 Procedural Accountability and Preservation Policy Framework
| | | | |
3.3.1 Designated community
| | | | |
3.3.2 Preservation policies
| | | | |
3.3.2.1 Review and update presevation policies
| | | | |
3.3.3 Documented history of changes
| | | | |
3.3.4 Commit to transparency
| | | | |
3.3.5 Information integrity measurements
| | | | |
3.3.6 Self-assessment and external certification
| | | | |
3.4 Financial Sustainability
| | | | |
3.4.1 Business planning processes
| | | | |
3.4.2 Financial transparency, compliance, and audits
| | | | |
3.4.3 Risk, benefit, investment, expenditure
| | | | |
3.5 Contracts, Licenses, & Liabilities
| | | | |
3.5.1 Contracts or deposit agreements for content
| | | | |
3.5.1.1 Contracts or deposit agreements forpreservation rights
| | | | |
3.5.1.2 Completeness of agreements with depositors
| | | | |
3.5.1.3 Policies about preservation responsibility
| | | | |
3.5.1.4 Policies about liability and rights challenges
| | | | |
3.5.2 Track and manage property rights/restrictions
| | | | |
4.1 Ingest - acquisition of content
| | | | |
4.1.1 Identify content information and information properties
| |
| | |
4.1.1.1 Procedures for identifying information properties that we will preserve
| | | | |
4.1.1.2 Record of content information and information properties that we will preserve
| | | | |
4.1.2 Specifiy content information at deposit
| | | | |
4.1.3 Recognition and parsing of SIPs
| | | | |
4.1.4 Verify the identity of the Producer
| | | | |
4.1.5 Verify SIPs for completeness and correctness
| | | | |
4.1.6 Obtain sufficient control over digital objects
| | | | |
4.1.7 Provide depositor with responses
| | | | |
4.1.8 Records of actions and processes related to acquisition
| | | | |
4.2 Ingest - creation of the AIP
| | | | |
4.2.1 Associated definition for each AIP or class of AIPs
| |
| | |
4.2.1.1 Identify which definition applies to which AIP
| | | | |
4.2.1.2 Definition of each AIP
| | | | |
4.2.2 Description of how AIPs are constructed from SIPs
| | | | |
4.2.3 Document final disposition of all SIPs
| | | | |
4.2.3.1 Procedures if a SIP is not incorporated or discarded
| | | | |
4.2.4 Convention that generates persistent, unique identifiers for AIPs
| | | | |
4.2.4.1 Uniquely identify each AIP
| | | | |
4.2.4.1.1 Have unique indentifiers
| | | | |
4.2.4.1.2 Assign and maintain persistent identifiers of the AIP and its components
| | | | |
4.2.4.1.3 Describe any processes for changes to identifiers
| | | | |
4.2.4.1.4 Provide a list of all identifiers and check for duplications
| | | | |
4.2.4.1.5 System of identifiers is adequate now and in the future
| | | | |
4.2.4.2 System of reliable linking/resolution services in order to find identified objects
| | | | |
4.2.5 Tool and resources to provide authoritative Representation Information for all objects
| | | | |
4.2.5.1 Tools or methods to identify the file types of all objects
| | | | |
4.2.5.2 Tools or methods to determine what Representation Information is necessary for understandability
| | | | |
4.2.5.3 Have access to the requisite Representation Information
| | | | |
4.2.5.4 Tools or methods to ensure that Representation Information is persistently associated with objects
| | | | |
4.2.6 Documented processes for acquiring PDI for associated Content Information
| | | | |
4.2.6.1 Documented processes for acquiring PDI
| | | | |
4.2.6.2 Execute documented processes for acquiring PDI
| | | | |
4.2.6.3 PDI is persistently associated with Content Information of AIP
| | | | |
4.2.7 Content Information is understandable for Designated Community at the time of AIP creation
| | | | |
4.2.7.1 Processes for testing understandability for Designated Community of the Content Information of AIPs
| | | | |
4.2.7.2 Execute testing process of Content Information of AIPs
| | | | |
4.2.7.3 Bring Content Information of AIP up to level of understandabililty if it fails testing
| | | | |
4.2.8 Verify each AIP for completeness and correctness
| | | | |
4.2.9 Independent mechanism for verifying the integrity of the content
| | | | |
4.2.10 Contemporaneous records of actions and administration processes relevant to AIP creation | | |
| |
4.3 Preservation Planning
| | | | |
4.3.1 Documented preservation strategies relevant to its holdings | | | | |
4.3.2 Mechanisms for monitoring its preservation environment | | | | |
4.3.2.1 Mechanisms for monitoring and notification when Representation Information is inadequate for the Designated Community to understand the data holdings | | | | |
4.3.3 Mechanisms to change preservation plans as a result of its monitoring activities |
| | | |
4.3.3.1 Mechanisms for creating, identifying or gathering any extra Representation Information required | | | | |
4.3.4 Provide evidence of the effectiveness of its preservation activities | | | | |